Everything about the product itself. For questions about Alberta courses, diploma exams and university admission, see the answer pages linked at the bottom.
There are four packages and each one includes the last. Free is $0 with no card. Checked is $39.99 a month, Exam Ready $69.99, Full Support $99.99 — all per student, with about 20% off if you pay annually.
Every level covers every course the student is taking; a second subject never costs extra. Prices are per student, so two students is twice the monthly price at any level.
For comparison, a private tutor in Alberta runs roughly $200–$320 a month for one hour a week in one subject.
Yes, and it's most of the study system rather than a preview of it. No card required, and it doesn't expire.
Free accounts get: every Alberta course, Grade 9 through the Grade 12 diploma courses. Practice questions run through the full four-step method — the ask, the first move, the working, the check. Flashcards and glossaries for every enrolled course. Recognition training and command-word training. The "how do I…" walkthroughs, which take a student through the method rather than handing over the answer. Timed practice tests. The academic calendar, with every assignment and test in one place. And the essay-writing starter.
You also get 200 tokens at signup to try any of the paid services.
The paid packages add the academic profile, the full essay-writing training, exam study guides, daily rundowns, the parent refresher, and monthly token allowances at lower per-use rates.
Every account opens with the whole platform unlocked for a week — the membership extras and the 200 tokens, no card. When the week ends the free features are still there at no cost, and nothing renews unless you decide it should.
Services outside your package are pay-per-use, priced in tokens. Assignment Check is 6 tokens a page on a free account; Assignment Help is 10. Each paid level includes a monthly allowance and drops the per-use rate, so the same token buys more the higher the package. Extra tokens are 20¢ each and don't expire. Parents can see exactly what's been spent and on what, from the dashboard.
We've elected to allocate a number of free accounts to organizations working with the underprivileged and individual families who may lack the financial means. We strongly believe academic resources should be made available to everyone regardless of their economic standing.
There's no means test and nothing to prove. The link is on the pricing page — take a free place.
No. A free account never requires a card — not to sign up, not for the first week when everything is unlocked, and not to keep using the free features afterward. A card is only needed if you choose to move onto a paid package.
Yes. There's no minimum term.
Because a tutor's cost is their hour. One hour a week, booked around someone else's schedule, in one subject, working on whatever your child remembers to bring. Joseki is there every night, in every course, and it has already seen every question they've answered.
No — that's the thing it's built not to do. Your child photographs the question, says what it's being asked in their own words, picks the opening move, and works it out. At each of those four checkpoints it confirms, corrects, or hands them a tool, then gets out of the way. If they're stuck it offers a video, a worked example, or the same question in simpler words. Never the answer.
Same underlying technology, opposite design. A general AI answers the question you ask it. This one walks through the question with the student instead of answering it for them, and it remembers every question they've ever answered, so it knows where they're weak. That memory is the part a general chatbot doesn't have.
Because the diploma exam is three hours in a room with no phone, no laptop and no AI, and it's about a third of the final mark in a Grade 12 diploma course. A student whose homework has been done for them has practised nothing. The assignment marks look fine right up until the exam.
Four things, and none of them are about being smarter than a person. It's there every night rather than one hour a week. It covers every course rather than one. It remembers every question the student has ever answered, so it knows where they're weak without anyone having to notice and mention it. And it marks assignments before they're handed in rather than reviewing them after the mark comes back.
What a tutor does better: reading the room, noticing when the real problem isn't the algebra, and building a relationship that makes a student show up. We're clear about that.
Question recognition — saying what's being asked before starting. First step — choosing the opening move, which earns partial marks even when the arithmetic later goes wrong. Work it out — the solving, with help when stuck. Verify — checking before handing in. They're four separate skills, and a student can be strong at three and lose marks every time on the fourth.
Alberta core courses, Grades 9 through 12. Math 9 through 30-1 and 30-2, English Language Arts, Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Science and Social Studies at every level, plus CALM.
Yes. Upload the assignment and it marks it right or wrong with the reason — the line and why, not the correction. A mistake found before submission is something to fix while the reasoning is fresh. The same mistake found a week later is just a mark on work nobody's thinking about any more.
Most parents can't, past a certain point, and nobody should expect otherwise. The parent refresher explains the specific thing on the page tonight the way a parent needs to see it — not a course, just enough to follow the conversation.
Four questions also work without knowing any of the content: what is the question asking, what did you write first, where does it stop making sense, and did you check it. A student explaining their work out loud catches their own errors at a much higher rate than one rereading silently.
From what they get wrong, not from what they say. A wrong answer carries more information than a right one — on a well-built question, which wrong option was chosen names the misconception. One distractor is what you get if you forget to convert units; another is the right method on the wrong quantity.
Nothing is discarded, so the picture builds from every question, assignment and practice test over months rather than from a single assessment day.
Give it the exam date. It builds the plan around the weakest areas, using what it has actually seen the student get wrong rather than what they say they're shaky on. Upload rubrics and write a practice exam and the picture gets sharper.
About five minutes, and it produces an honest read on academic strengths and weaknesses across the four steps plus how much time is going in and how focused it is. Free.
A parent approves the account before anything starts. You can set it up and send a join code, or your child can start and we'll email you to approve.
You get the report — what's improving and what still isn't. It's the part a tutor can't give you, because you hear about a tutoring session second-hand if at all.
Only for a couple of minutes. The phone photographs the assignment and runs the daily rundown. Then it's done, and the actual work happens without it.
That's a different problem and more explanation makes it worse — more input is the thing there's already too much of. What helps is shape: everything visible on one calendar, tonight sequenced into an order, and a defined finish so the evening ends rather than running until they give up.
If the anxiety doesn't lift once the week is organised — sleep, withdrawal, persistent low mood rather than being stretched — that isn't a scheduling problem and no study tool fixes it. That's a conversation with a doctor or a school counsellor. In Alberta, Health Link at 811 can point you to the right service.
It's built for that case. A tool that requires motivation before it does anything is no use to the students who need it most, which is why the process is broken into steps small enough to start.
Each student has their own — the value is in it knowing one student's specific weak areas, which doesn't work if two students share one profile.
No. The student does the thinking at every step — the tool confirms, corrects or hands over a resource. Nothing is produced for them to hand in as their own. If anything it's the opposite: it exists because AI that does the work for students leaves them unprepared for the exam.
It happens, and it's becoming more common. Discipline for AI-related misconduct rose roughly a third between 2022 and 2026 while the detection tools stayed unreliable — the University of Arizona has switched off the AI detection in its plagiarism software over false positives, and Turnitin's own guidance says its model shouldn't be the sole basis for action. False positives fall hardest on non-native English speakers and neurodivergent students.
What actually decides these cases isn't a detector score. Institutions are moving toward multi-evidence review — drafts, version history, prior writing, and asking the student to explain their own work. The strongest predictor of the outcome is whether the student can show a documented history of having done it.
A student working through the four steps has that. The question read in their own words, the first move they chose, the working, the check — it's a record of the thinking as it happened, which is exactly what a finished answer produced by AI can never be.
It's the same category of help as a tutor, a study group or a parent who knows the subject. The student still does the work.
A five-minute academic evaluation, free. Then a free plan that never expires — and full packages from $39.99 a month, every course included.
Start the free evaluation